Legislation seeks to reduce trauma related to
inconsistent transition and sibling placement
The Florida Senate today unanimously passed Senate Bill 80, Child Welfare, by Senator Jason Brodeur (R-Sanford). The legislation increases protections and consistency for children in out-of-home care.
“All too often people with the best of intentions get so caught up in finding the perfect situation for a child that we pass up a really good home where the child will be loved and cared for. Government is a horrible parent, and childhood is way too short for any kid to spend years waiting in limbo bouncing from home to home. We know the earlier in life we can give a child a permanent living situation, the better off that child will be in the long run,” said Senate President Wilton Simpson (R-Trilby), who was adopted at age six and has made improving Florida’s Child Welfare System a top priority of his term as Senate President. “I am very grateful to Senator Brodeur for leading this bill through the process and pleased to see it earn the unanimous support of my colleagues today. This great legislation provides a more thoughtful framework for how we make decisions about where a child is going to live, recognizing that in some cases consistency and the depth of relationships developed in out of home care count more than biology.”
“Our goal is to reduce the trauma children face when they are moved, sometimes abruptly, from one out-of-home placement to another. These are vulnerable young children who have been neglected or abused and we want to make sure they have the stability of a safe, permanent living situation as soon as possible. While reuniting children with members of their biological family is always a priority, it should not be a focus that excludes other equally important relationships the child has developed,” said Senator Brodeur, who is himself adopted. “These are sensitive and difficult issues. Government is having to step in because for any number of reasons a parent has fallen short of their responsibility to care for a child. I am grateful to my colleagues for their support and input as the bill moved through the committee process and for their unanimous support here today.”
The legislation expands and clarifies existing laws related to sibling and transition placements for children in out-of-home care. The bill also works to recognize and balance relationships young children develop with out-of-home caregivers and siblings with those of the child’s biological family members, in order to reduce trauma related to abrupt or frequent placement changes that remove children from safe, successful placements. Additionally, the bill also requires that a quick reference FACE sheet be created for each child to summarize the status of the child’s case and goals moving forward.
The bill requires a “FACE sheet” to be used in each child’s case in Florida’s Child Welfare System. The FACE Sheet must be uniform and in an electronic format. The Department of Children and Families (DCF) is required to develop or contract to use a software with this capability.
The sheet must include specific data points related to the child’s case, for the DCF and the Community Based Care (CBC) entities to keep in the dependency case file, including details on each transition the child has experienced since the initial placement. The FACE sheet must be updated at least once a month.
Currently, Florida’s Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) uses a “FACE sheet” for each child in the delinquency system for quick reference on demographic information, placement history, charges and arrest history, court orders, etc. Other states, including Iowa and Virginia, have implemented FACE sheets for child welfare cases.
The bill clarifies and expands the role and make-up of existing multidisciplinary teams (MDT) that are used to engage with families to ensure better decisions for the child. Certain people involved in the child’s case, such as the department, child, parents and other important family and friends would be invited to each team staffing. Further, the bill authorizes the DCF or CBC to include additional relevant experts and providers, such as a Guardian Ad Litem, school personnel, behavioral health providers and experts, or others to team meetings to provide additional perspectives for specific decisions related to the child.
The team must be formed as soon as possible when the child is removed from the home or within 72 hours after the child is removed in an emergency situation. If the team cannot come to a consensus, the person who acts as a facilitator for the team must file a report with the court and the DCF within 48 hours after the conclusion of the meeting. If a consensus is reached, the decision of the team becomes the official position, and the DCF and CBC are bound by the decision.
Placement and Education Transitions and Transition Planning
To facilitate more successful transitions, including educational transitions, the bill requires the development of detailed and child-appropriate transition plans that minimize the impact on the child. This occurs through coordination between the DCF, CBC and MDT prior to the child’s placement changing or, when the change is due to an emergency situation, within 72 hours. The bill helps prospective caregivers prepare for welcoming the child by ensuring the caregiver has access to information specific to the child and the transition plan.
Florida law currently acknowledges the importance of maintaining and strengthening sibling bonds as a key component to child well-being and a successful permanent placement for a child. Specifically, Section 39.522, F.S., currently establishes criteria for the court to consider when determining whether a change of custody is appropriate, including that the court must consider the sibling relationship regardless of the depth of the bond between the siblings.
The legislation creates consistency by specifying how the DCF and the CBCs must handle placement and transition of sibling groups at all points of the dependency process. Specifically, the bill outlines factors to consider when determining placement for child under three years of age who is part of a sibling group. The bill requires the court to balance the benefit of the bonds of the child with the caregiver or the sibling, as opposed to prioritizing the relationship between siblings over other relationships. For example, the bill requires the DCF to make reasonable efforts to make the initial placement of a child who enters out-of-home care later than his or her siblings with the sibling if it will not disrupt the placement. However, the state would not be required to make a change of placement to develop a sibling bond that does not exist. The legislation also provides for the contact and visitation between siblings who are not placed together in out-of-home care, with the goal of assisting the siblings with continuing such relationships or possibly developing the relationship.
Transition planning is critical for children whether they are being moved to another temporary setting or to potentially permanent families. Florida law does not currently provide a centralized section of law detailing procedures for how a child is to be transitioned between placements throughout the dependency process.
The legislation provides additional factors for the court to consider when determining changes of custody. The bill creates a rebuttable presumption that more equally balances the express wishes of a biological parent, relative, or caregiver with other important factors. Specifically, the bill clarifies that the best interest of the child is to continue the current placement when reunification is not a permanent option, the child has resided in a safe and stable placement for nine continuous months, or if the custodian in the current placement is eligible for consideration as an adoptive parent or permanent custodian.
The bill requires the court to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the best placement and imposes deadlines for the evidentiary hearing. An initial status hearing must be held within seven days after a caregiver provides written notice to the court, and the DCF would be prohibited from moving the child until a court order states to do so. The legislation requires the court to appoint an attorney for the child and an independent expert in attachment and bonding, and authorizes the caregiver to retain counsel.