In a recent article published in the Insurance Journal, Lisa Miller lays out her case for how Florida’s Flood Insurance model could be a solution for the rest of the country. [Read more…] about How Florida’s Flood Insurance Model Could Work Nationwide
Stronger Safer Florida
Christian Camara Op-Ed: Cat Fund and Other Pre-Irma Insurance Decisions Saved Florida from Economic Disaster
Earlier this month marked the sixth month anniversary of Hurricane Irma making its historic landfall in the state of Florida. Last week, Christian Camara of the R-Street Institute authored an opinion article for Sunshine State News. The article notes the important decisions made by the Florida Legislature to appropriately fund the state’s “rainy day” Hurricane Catastrophe Fund have allowed a vast majority of Floridians to return to a normal daily life. Strategic investments in reinsurance and an appropriate amount of cash on hand allowed for this scenario and it is important for the Legislature to stay the course in future sessions.
Read Christian’s Op-ed below.
September’s strike of Hurricane Irma was one of the strongest storms Florida has ever seen. Every region of the state was affected in some way by the storm, which thus far has caused nearly $8 billion in insured property losses.
While $8 billion is no small number, had the storm stayed on its original forecast track just 50 to 100 miles east of its eventual path — had it directly hit Miami-Dade County and traveled up the entire peninsula, losses easily could have been topped $100 billion.
For most of us in the Sunshine State, life has returned to a sense of normalcy. Debris has been removed, roofs have been shingled and businesses have resumed normal operations. For that, we can thank the prudent decisions of the Florida Legislature and Gov. Rick Scott, their handling of the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund and Citizens Property Insurance Corp., a favorable reinsurance market and quite a bit of luck from Mother Nature.
Since 2006, Florida saw an unprecedented run of 10 hurricane-free years. In that time, the Florida Legislature wisely chose to build up cash in the Cat Fund, which provides backup coverage called reinsurance both to Citizens and to the state’s many primary insurance companies. This literal “rainy day” fund has a statutory mandate to sell roughly $17 billion in coverage, even when it doesn’t have the resources to pay all of those claims. When a sufficiently bad hurricane strikes the state and the Cat Fund doesn’t have enough cash on hand, it finances those losses by issuing debt. That debt is repaid by policyholders through “hurricane taxes” on their policies for several years.
Were the Cat Fund to be struck by a second large loss in a given year, the claims could even exceed its ability to issue new debt. We don’t really have an answer as to what would happen should that occur, but it certainly would be messy.
To avoid these undesirable scenarios, the Cat Fund has in recent years started to purchase reinsurance of its own. Reinsurers use diversification to pool risks from around the globe, taking on earthquakes in Asia and hurricanes in Florida, with the odds that very large catastrophes in all of these different markets are unlikely to happen all at once.
Had the Legislature and Gov. Scott not acted to shrink the size of Citizens and shore up the resources of the Cat Fund, including through reinsurance, Irma could have left Florida taxpayers with billions in debt. It also likely would have destabilized the Florida insurance market and the state’s economy.
Instead, the losses have been quite manageable. In fact, just days after the storm had cleared the Panhandle, insurance companies, with reinsurance payments in hand, were able to begin paying claims. This allowed rebuilding efforts to begin and infused the state’s economy with outside capital.
Despite the losses from Irma, the Cat Fund looks likely to remain fully funded. Florida’s private insurance companies were able to make good on their claims quickly and without any disruptions.
Just as politicians should learn from their mistakes, so too should they learn from and build upon their success on this issue by staying the course.
Christian Cámara (@ChristianCamara) is a senior fellow at the R Street Institute, a member of the Stronger Safer Florida coalition.
ICYMI: Stronger Safer Florida Coalition Urges Congress To Exempt Reinsurance From Border Adjustment Tax Legislation
Florida Homeowners Property Insurance Could Rise by 30 Percent Per Year
In March, Florida Taxwatch, the state’s independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit taxpayer research institute & government watchdog, released a study called The Effects of a Border-Adjusted Tax on Florida’s Property Insurance Market. The study takes a close look at what Floridians could expect if potential federal legislation that creates a border-adjusted corporate income tax is implemented. Since property insurers rely heavily on foreign reinsurance to diversify low-frequency-high-severity natural catastrophes, such as hurricanes, states most vulnerable to catastrophic losses—such as Florida—would be most impacted by applying a border-adjusted tax to reinsurance.
The proposed 20 percent border-adjusted tax would have a significant negative impact on Florida’s home insurance premiums, raising the cost of commercial and residential property insurance by $2.6 billion annually. Florida homeowners’ premiums, on average, would increase by $910 per year.
“While other countries around the world use tax schemes like the border-adjustment proposal, no developed market trading partner of the U.S. applies it to reinsurance transactions. Applying this proposed border-adjusted tax to reinsurance transactions would have a disproportionate and negative effect on Florida,” said Florida TaxWatch President and CEO Dominic M. Calabro. “Application of the tax would dramatically increase costs for insurance companies and consumers, hurt our state’s economic competitiveness, and kill tens of thousands of jobs.”
“The long-term damage to the state economy by the application of such a tax on reinsurance would put Florida behind for years,” said Stronger Safer Florida Coalition member, Associated Industries of Florida President and CEO Tom Feeney. “A decrease in earnings would propel the cost of living higher, while increased costs for hurricane-risk insurance would hamper Florida’s economic growth through declines in business investment in the state. Due to Florida’s susceptibility to major storms, it is crucial that insurance is affordable for businesses and residents.”
Read the full report here.
For more information, visit StrongerSaferFlorida.com.